5-7.
The Meaning of Classifying Costs in Fixed Costs and Variable costs
|
|
The
break-even sales in the managed-gross-profit chart is a little different from
the
break-even sales under direct costing, if inventories =0. This is because in the managed
gross profit theory, indirect costs are not classified into fixed costs and
variable costs, but under direct costing, on the other hand, indirect costs
are classified into fixed costs and variable costs. This influence will be
studied.
|
|
When,
in an actual business management, actual sales are close to the breakeven-sales, there
occur no problems, because the two sales run close to each other.
When the actual sales are far from the breakeven-sales, the breakeven-sales in the
managed gross profit chart are obviously a little different from the
breakeven-sales under direct costing because of the above-mentioned reason.
However, this influence is unworthy of discussion in actual business management
terms for
the following reasons:
|
|
(1)In
general, administrative personnel costs (actual costs) in indirect costs are not
always constant from the beginning to the end of a fiscal year. If one
kind of indirect cost is classified as a fixed cost at the beginning of the
year in ledgers, this will vary, as needed by managers’ judgments during
the period.
|
|
(2)It is
found, by making a managed gross profit chart, that the break-even sales are
largely influenced by human abilities such as selling power (it is a
function of
two variables, unit price and sales quantity of goods sold) and cost
control abilities which carry out direct cost reduction and implement increases or
decreases in indirect costs.
|
|
(3)When
actual sales are far from the break-even sales, the managerial value of
breakeven-sales obtained from the break-even chart is small. If one is required to make a forecasting income
statement, in which the target of sales are far from the break-even sales, one only
needs to remake a new planning statement based on the new sales.
|
|
(4)From
my point of view, the profit concept in absorption costing is more
reasonable
than in direct costing. Companies should aim at the profit
defined in financial statements under absorption costing, and so they should use
the break-even point derived from the managed gross profit chart.
|
|